Dealing With a Negative Editorial Decision. Theoretically Correct vs Practical Notation. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience . Finally, despite persistent beliefs to the contrary, we do not base our decisions on the reputations of the authors or their friends, and so we do not respond favorably to 'celebrity endorsements' or statements about authors' previous track records. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Many journals now rely on editorial management systems, which are supposed to support the administration and decision making of editors, while aiming at making the process of communication faster and more transparent to both reviewers and authors. The first step in making the right decision is recognizing the problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. March 1, 2023 - As we approach, on March 14, its 12-year anniversary, now is as good a time as any to reflect on Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") Rule 206 (4)-5 (the "Pay-to-Play Rule . [CDATA[// > To obtain section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga editor decision started nature rejection We would suggest that you wait for another 2 weeks before writing to the journal for an update. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. @Fomite so you still said gamma with just 1 parameter What is the other? v. t. e. Sovereignty generally refers to the supreme authority of a state or territory. . My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. It doesnt mean anything other than the editor has started to look at your paper. After the Editor in Chief assigns the manuscript to an editor, the next task is "waiting for reviewer assignment" by that assigned editor. paper acceptance probability in case of long peer review time for the 1st decision. //--> Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. How long does it take to publish a paper in Journal? The journal opened for submissions on April 20, 2016. If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. response letterresubmit, 3. . In all cases, authors are expected to abide by the Nature Research press and embargo policies. This referees opinion must be satisfied for the manuscript to be published, but as this referee may not know about the field concerned, an endorsement in isolation from the other referee(s) would not constitute grounds for publication. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. How did it go for you after this? b. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? We understand your anxiety :-) However, the. 9.3 weeks. Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). Calm down, and wait a few days before starting your response, then re-read the version of the paper that you actually submitted. What could this mean? :-). Currently, the status is "Peer Review Over" and "Decision Started" since more than 15 days. As opposed to an editor, a peer reviewer advises the researcher of how he would have conducted his research, and what research methods would have made a difference. The initial judgement is not a reflection on the technical validity of the work described, or on its importance to people in the same field. ISSN 1476-4687 (online) Later in life this person's emotional feelings about the United States might be challenged if the person reads a critical history. Answer (1 of 7): Most submissions are rejected by editors without review, and this should be fast - perhaps, two weeks (?). . Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. The titles of forthcoming papers will be listed on the mailing, along with the corresponding authors' contact details, which means authors may receive media enquiries relating to their paper during this embargo period. Production Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Many papers are published online ahead of print publication date: corresponding authors of these papers will be informed by e-mail when the online publication date is confirmed, one week ahead of publication. AE stands for Associate Editor. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. The first thing to do when you get a rejection is to take a deep breath and consider your options. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. Read the entire letter, including all of the reviewers comments and the editors explanations (if any). good . Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision; Accept; Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author in a formal letter, along with reviewer feedback and any other requirements from the . In [i] we find started associated with past time in [a] but with future time in [b], as indicated by the temporal modifiers yesterday and tomorrow respectively. The process was on par with other journal experiences, but I do not appreciate the inconsistency between what the editor at Nature Medicine told me when transferring to Nature Comms, and the final evaluation at Nature Comms. One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a broader perspective and a wider context from which to view the paper. Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. Journals vary in their attitude toward such trade-offs, for example in deciding whether to publish a paper that proposes an important new idea based on data that are less than solid. any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. //-->