For example, here we have some JavaScript that changes an anchor element's href attribute using data from the URL: You can exploit this by modifying the URL so that the location.search source contains a malicious JavaScript URL. There are 3 primary types of cross-site scripting: DOM-based XSS. For XSS attacks to be successful, an attacker needs to insert and execute malicious content in a webpage. This helps quickly identify a large chunk of violations. This information should help you narrow down which parts of code may be introducing DOM XSS and need to change.Most of the violations like this can also be detected by running a code linter or static code checkers on your codebase. Login here. Cross-site scripting (also known as XSS) is a web security vulnerability that allows an attacker to compromise the interactions that users have with a vulnerable application. This can lead to a range of attacks, including stealing sensitive information, hijacking user accounts, and spreading malware. -->, "javascript:myFunction('<%=ESAPI.encoder().encodeForJavascript(untrustedData)%>', 'test');", "<%=ESAPI.encoder().encodeForHTML(last_name)%>", //when the value is retrieved the encoding is reversed. Thankfully, many sinks where variables can be placed are safe. Frameworks make it easy to ensure variables are correctly validated and escaped or sanitised. Even newer versions of jQuery can still be vulnerable via the $() selector sink, provided you have full control over its input from a source that doesn't require a # prefix. Information on ordering, pricing, and more. Other CSS Contexts are unsafe and you should not place variable data in them. So XSS has already been around for a while. Use a trusted and verified library to escape HTML inputs. Start with using your frameworks default output encoding protection when you wish to display data as the user typed it in. DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities usually arise when JavaScript takes data from an attacker-controllable source, such as the URL, and passes it to a sink that supports dynamic code execution, such as eval() or innerHTML. Output Encoding and HTML Sanitization help address those gaps. WAFs also dont address the root cause of an XSS vulnerability. innerHTML, outerHTML,insertAdjacentHTML, <iframe> srcdoc, document.write, document.writeln, and DOMParser.parseFromString, Executing plugin content: <embed src>, <object data> and <object codebase>, Runtime JavaScript code compilation: eval, setTimeout, setInterval, new Function(). Get help and advice from our experts on all things Burp. Using the right combination of defensive techniques is necessary to prevent XSS. The name originated from early versions of the attack where stealing data cross-site was the primary focus. If you need to render different content, use innerText instead of innerHTML. In some . It is important to note that when setting an HTML attribute which does not execute code, the value is set directly within the object attribute of the HTML element so there is no concerns with injecting up. Now all the violations are reported to //my-csp-endpoint.example, but the website continues to work. JavaScript Contexts refer to placing variables into inline JavaScript which is then embedded in an HTML document. In those cases, create a Trusted Type object yourself. Others have a root cause on the client, where the JavaScript code calls dangerous functions with user-controlled content. It is almost impossible to detect DOM XSS only from the server-side (using HTTP requests). The purpose of output encoding (as it relates to Cross Site Scripting) is to convert untrusted input into a safe form where the input is displayed as data to the user without executing as code in the browser. Trusted Types require you to process the data before passing it to the above sink functions. You must regularly patch DOMPurify or other HTML Sanitization libraries that you use. The JavaScript or VBScript parser of an execution context is associated with the parsing and execution of script code. The Razor engine used in MVC automatically encodes all output sourced from variables, unless you work really hard to prevent it doing so. In a stored DOM XSS vulnerability, the server receives data from one request, stores it, and then includes the data in a later response. What would be displayed in the input text field would be "Johnson & Johnson". Here are some examples of encoded values for specific characters. In reflective and stored cross-site scripting attacks, you can see the vulnerability payload in the response page. There are several methods and attributes which can be used to directly render HTML content within JavaScript. When a browser is rendering HTML and any other associated content like CSS or JavaScript, it identifies various rendering contexts for the different kinds of input and follows different rules for each context. That said, you should also analyze the CSP violations, as these trigger when the non-conforming code is executed. DOM-based XSS is a type of cross-site scripting attack that takes advantage of vulnerabilities in the Document Object Model (DOM) of a web page. Use the default policy sparingly, and prefer refactoring the application to use regular policies instead. For that, first create a policy. Level up your hacking and earn more bug bounties. Cross-Site Scripting, or XSS, is a type of web vulnerability that allows an attacker to inject malicious code into a website or web application. A Computer Science portal for geeks. Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support. Quoting makes it difficult to change the context a variable operates in, which helps prevent XSS. Note that the browser's "View source" option won't work for DOM XSS testing because it doesn't take account of changes that have been performed in the HTML by JavaScript. If your web site makes heavy use of non-Latin characters, such as Chinese, Cyrillic or others this is probably not the behavior you want. We want to hear from you! DOM-based cross-site scripting (DOM XSS) is a web vulnerability, a subtype of cross-site scripting. To detect the possibility of a DOM XSS, you must simulate the attack from the client-side in the users browser using a web application scanner like Acunetix (with DOM-based XSS scanner functionality). This behavior also affects Razor TagHelper and HtmlHelper rendering as it will use the encoders to output your strings. Output encoding here will prevent XSS, but it will break the intended functionality of the application. Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities occur when: Untrusted data enters a web application, typically from a web request. Tag helpers will also encode input you use in tag parameters. You can deploy a report collector (such as the open-source go-csp-collector), or use one of the commercial equivalents. It uses HTML attribute encoding rules whenever you use the @ directive. Your application can be vulnerable to both reflected/stored XSS and DOM XSS. What's the difference between Pro and Enterprise Edition? For example if you want to use user input to write in a div tag element don't use innerHtml, instead use innerText or textContent. From my experience, calling the expression() function from an execution context (JavaScript) has been disabled. Those are Safe Sinks as long as the attribute name is hardcoded and innocuous, like id or class. Each parser has distinct and separate semantics in the way they can possibly execute script code which make creating consistent rules for mitigating vulnerabilities in various contexts difficult. If you use Burp's browser, however, you can take advantage of its built-in DOM Invader extension, which does a lot of the hard work for you. Read about other types of cross-site scripting attacks. Use a CSP as an additional layer of defense and have a look at the. The styling will not be rendered. your framework), you should be able to mitigate all XSS vulnerabilities. For details, see the Google Developers Site Policies. Read the entire Acunetix Web Application Vulnerability Report. Output encoding is not perfect. The web application dynamically generates a web page that contains this untrusted data. "\u0061\u006c\u0065\u0072\u0074\u0028\u0037\u0029". Acunetix uses its DeepScan technology to attempt DOM XSS against the client-side code and report vulnerabilities. In this case, AngularJS will execute JavaScript inside double curly braces that can occur directly in HTML or inside attributes. Trusted Types give you the tools to write, security review, and maintain applications free of DOM XSS vulnerabilities by making the dangerous web API functions secure by default. The defined rules will HTML-escape < characters to prevent the creation of new HTML elements. In a DOM-based attacks, the HTTP response on the server side does not change. This view outputs the contents of the untrustedInput variable. More info about Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge. Get started with Burp Suite Enterprise Edition. Trusted Types work by locking down the following risky sink functions. DOM Based Attacks. DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting. Stored XSS is considered the most damaging type of XSS attack. DOM-based cross-site scripting attack DOM-based XSS is also sometimes called "type-0 XSS." It occurs when the XSS vector executes as a result of a DOM modification on a website in a user's browser. This is why you would need to HTML encode too. Output encoding is the primary defense against cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. No single technique will solve XSS. 99% of the time it is an indication of bad or lazy programming practice, so simply don't do it instead of trying to sanitize the input. Products Insight Platform Solutions XDR & SIEM INSIGHTIDR Threat Intelligence THREAT COMMAND Vulnerability Management INSIGHTVM Dynamic Application Security Testing INSIGHTAPPSEC The good news is that if user input is handled properly at the foundation level (e.g. Please look at the OWASP Java Encoder JavaScript encoding examples for examples of proper JavaScript use that requires minimal encoding. To prevent server-side XSS, don't generate HTML by concatenating strings and use safe contextual-autoescaping templating libraries instead. OWASP recommends DOMPurify for HTML Sanitization. Doing so encourages designs in which the security rules are close to the data that they process, where you have the most context to correctly sanitize the value. Accelerate penetration testing - find more bugs, more quickly. There are also TrustedScript and TrustedScriptURL objects for other sensitive sinks. URL Contexts refer to variables placed into a URL. Canonicalize input, URL Validation, Safe URL verification, Allow-list http and HTTPS URLs only (Avoid the JavaScript Protocol to Open a new Window), Attribute encoder. DOM-based XSS is a kind of XSS occurring entirely on the client-side. To test for DOM-based cross-site scripting manually, you generally need to use a browser with developer tools, such as Chrome. The appropriate encoding to use in the above case would be only JavaScript encoding to disallow an attacker from closing out the single quotes and in-lining code, or escaping to HTML and opening a new script tag. DOM-based XSS is an attack that modifies the domain object model (DOM) on the client side ( the browser). HTML Attribute Contexts refer to placing a variable in an HTML attribute value. Perpetrators can insert malicious code into a page due to modifying the DOM environment (Document Object Model) when it doesn't properly filter user input. The setAttribute(name_string,value_string) method is dangerous because it implicitly coerces the value_string into the DOM attribute datatype of name_string. At a basic level XSS works by tricking your application into inserting a