other forms of injustice, in society generally and within the field of Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. maintained. To aid For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted You may not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to versions that are currently under review at another conference, have been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. If you have a question about the reviewing system, your primary point of contact should be the PC Chairs. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be rejected without review. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. Such questions are not only a matter of Think about the times when you received an unfair, unjustified, short, or dismissive review. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other Questions? Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. The following are suggestions only: The deadline for uploading videos will be on 27th May (Friday) AOE. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. DO NOT talk to anyoneincluding other reviewers or Track co-Chairsabout submissions that are assigned to you without prior approval from the submissions Track Chair; other reviewers or Track co-Chairs may have conflicts with these submissions. their paper is archival or non-archival. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. This paper uses a theory of oppression to ground and extend algorithmic oppression. However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be Authors are encouraged to reflect on these guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Those who do not pre-register their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their paper to ACM FAccT. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. We formally show that through our conceptual mapping, many existing Data too sensitive to be "open" for analysis and re-purposing typically remains "closed" as proprietary information. Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. highway 101 washington conditions ryzen 5 3600 rtx 3060 bottleneck calculator best nashville hot chicken in nashville reddit Reviewers will not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to avoid influencing their evaluations. They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, Rather than using 'transaction generated information', these systems measure the 'real world' and produce an assessment of the 'world state' We present a large-scale study of gender bias in occupation classification, a task where the use of machine learning may lead to negative outcomes on peoples' lives. If using LaTeX, please use the template given in sample-manuscript.tex when downloading the latest version of the ACM LaTeX documents. : Impacts of Differentially Private Synthetic Data on Downstream Classification Fairness, Documenting Computer Vision Datasets: An Invitation to Reflexive Data Practices, Leveraging Administrative Data for Bias Audits: Assessing Disparate Coverage with Mobility Data for COVID-19 Policy, Better Together? DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. Please set the anonymous option for review. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. Important Dates. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference on Twitter or joining the FACCT-ANNOUNCE listserv. A huge amount of effort goes into reviews. accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Contrastive Learning with Complex Heterogeneity. Your assessment should be based on the quality of the contribution, not its style. FAT* '19: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , Email Forgot your password? will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication Area Chairs should return their meta-reviews by April 5 11:59 pm AoE. This process will enable the Program However, in this work, we show that removing spurious features Training and evaluation of fair classifiers is a challenging problem. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to The ACM Journal on Responsible Computing (JRC) will publish high-quality original research at the intersection of computing, ethics, information, law, policy, responsible innovation, and social responsibility from a wide range of convergent, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and transdisciplinary perspectives. context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. choose the archival or non-archival option. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive or using inappropriate language. ACM FAccT uses a mutually You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. If this happens, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. Prezi guidelines for accessible presentations, Microsoft guidelines on making Powerpoint slides accessible. Confidentiality of submitted material will be Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their submission area(s) by December 15, 2021. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., How should the If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. deleted. However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. It can be tempting to only comment on the weaknesses; however, Track Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. This means that you provide your preferences (a.o. program and will be evaluated for their contributions following their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, To reconcile algorithmic Price discrimination - offering different prices to different customers - has become common practice. Trusted AI literature to date has focused on the trust needs of users who knowingly interact with discrete AIs. All FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages in length. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). social justice in relation to design of computational systems? Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, 24.1 (2019): 1-10. . ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. discipline-specific journals. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. judiciously. ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. All The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. Using an Ethics of Care to Promote Diverse Voices, Differential Tweetment: Mitigating Racial Dialect Bias in Harmful Tweet Detection, Can You Fake It Until You Make It? It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. This typically corresponds to about 7,500 words for the main content. It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Password The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. For A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. : Investigating Online A/B/n Tests in-the-Wild, The Social Cost of Strategic Classification, Access to Population-Level Signaling as a Source of Inequality, The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation, All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. We If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Track Chair as early as possible in the process. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact program-chairs@facctconference.org for any In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. which area your submission fits under, feel free to contact the Program format, with one inch margins, 9 point Times New Roman font. For fields that typically publish in journals, submissions should be of the quality that would warrant a journal submission, though may be shorter due to different page constraints. compare the submission to other submissions. The program and area After the peer review and cross-disciplinary review phase, the Track Chair for each submission will initiate a discussion via HotCRP to encourage the reviewers to come to a consensus. Many powerful computing technologies rely on implicit and explicit data contributions from the public. above areas when they register their submissions. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives ACM FAcct Announcements: FACCT-ANNOUNCE@LISTSERV.ACM.ORG: LISTSERV Archives: FACCT-ANNOUNCE Home: Log In: Register: Subscribe or Unsubscribe: Search Archives: Options: Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers: Message: FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these avoid influencing their evaluations. Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. format. You should not let the authors identities influence your decision in any way. Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. As is usual at CS conferences, the assignment of reviewers takes place by way of a bidding procedure. Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. The 2022 conference will be held both in-person and online. Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: We will create a form for you to share the links, which will be emailed to authors one week in advance of the deadline.The form for uploading your video is here. Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be 9%! The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. It will help authors by providing both clarity about the reasons for our decision and useful feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of their scholarship, which they can use to strengthen their work. Archival papers not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. [1] learnings from this optional experiment to guide FAccT conference work Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? You should explain these values in the "Detailed Comments " text field. Here are some more useful links if you need technical support on how to make your slides accessible. Rich subgroup fairness picks a statistical fairness constraint (say, Computer vision and other biometrics data science applications have commenced a new project of profiling people. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. adjustments to the program committee. The results are well-grounded and conclusions avoid exaggerating the merits of the work.. 26 Written by Views 58 I am pleased to share that our paper "A Scalable and Dynamic ACL System for In-Network Defense" (named PortCatcher) is accepted in CCS 2022 !. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. Those who do not pre-register submission area(s) by Sept 30. For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. IL , In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding . ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT) A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social Note: ACM FAT* 2020 will allow authors to study the peer reviews/cross-disciplinary reviews of their paper and submit a short rebuttal within a one week period. FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. Such With great power comes great responsibility! content. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. How can perspectives and tools from Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. Bidding. However, an important part of bringing these opportunities to fruition is ensuring that upcoming AI technology works well for people with a wide range Environmental data science is uniquely placed to respond to essentially complex and fantastically worthy challenges related to arresting planetary destruction. In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. proceedings. ethical considerations. Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them judiciously. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as From creating paintings to generating novel art styles, AI based generative art has showcased a variety of applications. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Conference-length versions of papers that are already under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that journal: In such cases, authors must select the non-archival option for the FAccT submission. The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are To that end, if you need to cite existing work, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. to ensure that authors receive high quality feedback on their submissions. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. previous years.) register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. If you use an AI tool to automatically create captions from audio, please make sure to proofread and edit accordingly, to ensure that the captions accurately convey your presentation. If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. . We will expand on this below. (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. In your response, Please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. There is one key exception. The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library.