But Holmes talked her way out of the decision and prevented subsequent intervention by multiplying the voting rights of her shares to give her 99% of total voting rights. Carreyrous first article appeared in October 2015, and revealed: Theranos did less than 10 percent of its tests on Edison machines.. She said nothing concrete. So, if you can imagine operating a company that had taken 700 million dollars from investors, and that had been valued at 9 billion dollars without a CFO, that's something a healthy board would be interested in. They briefly had a CFO very early on in the company. Home Depots co-founder As a board member, even if you don't know anything about the science behind the company, any key departure like that should have been investigated. Required fields are marked *. And then they had no CFO until the final year. Jan. 6, 2022 5:30 am ET. What we continue to learn about Theranos is that the level of deception was unprecedented and that Homes surely belong in jail. They want to look for rewarded risk. Most people put more trust on glassdoor reviews than what a CEO says in a TV interview before they take a job because usually, people that work in the weeds are the ones that know what a place is really like. Summary. Theranos, a fast-growing private company intent on trailblazing a new technology, set out to attain ambitious goals. Any employees that raised ethical issues were fired and no questions were allowed. It would not be me if I didnt talk about Warren Buffet while I was talking about corporate governance and ethics. As Wayne Guay and James Angel discussed in this podcast for Wharton School of Business, Theranos was an example of corporate governance failure that defrauded investors of $700 million. The company was criticized for having a board of directorsprimarily composed of former diplomats and military personnel. Theranos has since changed its board structure to include a smaller board of directors, a new board of counselors and a medical advisory board staffed with physicians and researchers. When two would-be whistleblowers told the Theranos board that Holmes had exaggerated revenue projections . She talked about her fear of needles and blood. The culture at Theranos was toxic, Carreyrou said. A miniaturized blood analyzer that would disrupt. It is very easy to notice here how none of these people have any affiliation to medical science. Time selected her as one of its 100 Most Influential People. 2004-2010: Theranos thrives with early funding. Case Study: Violating Disclosure Laws. Now, hopefully this is not the case for people who are on this call and who are in corporations or serving on boards. They didn't have a general counsel for a long time, until I think it was 2015. But, somehow, Holmes was able to get away with it. eventually fail to sustain its operations. One of the US senators was a heart transplant surgeon but he obviously spent more time on policy than medicine by the time Theranos came along. A vision to give normal people the ability to test and access their own health data by making blood tests cheap and accessible. Forbes named her one of the richest self-made women in the world. By February 2015 the Theranos fairytale was about to unravel publicly. Take our quiz to find out. In addition to a loss of legitimacy, Theranos risks losing its license to operate labs, and CEO Elizabeth Holmes would likely be forced to exit the industry. Also problematic was Holmes attempt to adapt the traditional Silicon Valley business model of fail fast and fake it until you make it to a tech startup developing a product with public health implications, Carreyrou said. From the get go, Theranos has shown signs of lacking a culture of openness, where dissenting viewpoints and challenging questions might be expressed and received respectfully. The Wall Street Journal, which published the glowing article about Theranos early on, ultimately unraveled its myth, thanks to a months-long investigation by reporter John Carreyrou. For Holmes, the dog represented the journey that lay ahead for Theranos. Why does a startup need the best law firm in the country representing them? What she meant is that as a board member of an organization, you represented the investors of the company. Tom Fox:Yeah. Theranos sold a noble vision to its investors and the world. How does such a politically and militarily connected board not know that these claims are being made to investors? A rigorous, hands-on program that prepares adaptive problem solvers for premier finance careers. When you enter industries where lives are in the balance, you cant really just iterate and debug as youre going. Corporate governance, according to Investopedia, is the system of rules, practices and processes by which a firm is directed and controlled. The idea was sound, but the secrecy, lies, and toxic culture at diagnostics startup Theranos meant it was held up by a scaffolding of fraud. Tom Fox:In addition to no CFO, none of the investors, none of the board had the benefit of audited financial statements. Were they just purposefully ignorant or were they just that blind to the charisma of Elizabeth? . But, it is also a reminder that business owners often make bad decisions when faced with certain pressures that are perceived to be rigid. The board appears to have been assembled primarily to secure influential government connections, rather than to govern with solid industry insight, product knowledge and operational expertise. As a consequence, the fact of the failing technology was able to be kept secret, which fostered a negative culture of mistrust and secrecy. Non-degree programs for senior executives and high-potential managers. George Schultz even went as far as straining his relationship with his grandson who worked at Theranos by supporting and believing Elizabeth over his own grandson. Both Holmes and the board were out of their depth.. Customers called and complained about faulty blood results that led these families to run to the Emergency Room. If you look with hindsight at how the company was structured, there's evidence that all the decisions were made by Elizabeth and, at least while he was there, her second in command - Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani. They do not have responsibility for day to day management, but they need to make sure they're informed and in this case they needed to be informed of risk areas and mitigation plans and there's no evidence that that ever took place at Theranos. Your email address will not be published. The issues that Theranos faced were repeatedly raised internally by employees. Amii:Warren Buffet has three criteria for board members. A lot of people have commented on that that was the case here. Holmes' company raised $6.9m in early funding soon after its foundation, gaining a $30m valuation. Attribution It is the responsibility of the board to identify systemic issues and take the necessary steps to rectify the situation. Now it's under civil and criminal investigation for defrauding investors. Theranos is a Silicon Valley startup once valued at as much as $9 billion. For now and for what it is worth, the board members have my strongest stamp of disapproval and I say SHAME ON YOU for not doing your job. Theranos's fall from grace is one large-scale compliance failure. That is about where the similarities ceased. Would-be whistleblowers were threatened with lawsuits. If the technology of Theranos turns out to be not what it claims, investors would almost certainly seek to sue the chief executive, Ms. Holmes, and the company, as well as the board that allowed. I like the simplicity of that. In the face of corruption in India, wise business leaders must decide what is negotiable and what isnt. Corporate Governance Background & Duties of BOD Managerial Capitalism, Agency Problem Board of Directors: Elected group of individuals who have a legal duty to establish corporate objectives, develop broad policies, and select top-level personnel to carry out the objectives. primarily composed of former diplomats and military personnel. In total, Volkswagen installed defeat devices in 11 million cars across the globe between 2009 and 2015, 500,000 of which were in the U.S. Volkswagen were forced to pay a heavy price for their governance failures in the aftermath of the scandal, most notably a mammoth $18 billion fine from the EPA. This button displays the currently selected search type. Usually there's at least a general counsel at some point to serve in a dual-hatted role. To read a transcript, scroll below. The Theranos issue is just one of the proof that companies need to have a cautious yet. What fast-growing startups and their boards must understand about building culture. So far Theranos has raised about $750 million. They go to the regulators. Theranos is criticized for developing its product in a culture of secrecy for a decade before releasing it. Of course, in a highly regulated industry like healthcare or financial services, board members need to be aware that there's a greater degree of scrutiny than in other industries where it might not be as high. How about no compliance and ethics officer? Conclusion. Fortress Investment Group LLC, a division of SoftBank demanded an independent auditor's opinion on Theranos' 2017 financial statements as a condition of loaning the company $100 million in December 2017, $65 million immediately and the rest if it got a clean audit and met other conditions. Professor Anat Admati, faculty director of the Corporations and Society Initiative, noted in her introduction for the event that Theranos raises many questions, and that Carreyrou could help the Stanford community by shedding light on what happened and what the audience can learn from this story. This 20-month MBA program equips experienced executives to enhance their impact on their organizations and the world. It needs to be proportionate. More navigation items; Post-mortem on Theranoswhere were the controls? Or its new and shiny and seems clean, so all is good with the product or process or company or person. In my consulting work with company boards and CEO's, we work together to build healthy board governance and executive leadership practices. Criticism of leadership or practices was unwelcome. Across the Board is a part of the Compliance Podcast Network. She has shaped many company cultures and strategic initiatives as an executive at Fortune 20 companies, smaller business and non-profits, and leading multiple functions, including human resources, legal, IT, communications, and compliance. Amii Barnard-Bahn (amii@barnardbahn.com) is an executive coach and strategic advisor to business executives and directors. They could not know what Warren was investing their money in but he had built a strong level of credibility in the business and had immensely strong character witnesses. Im pretty certain she didnt drop out of Stanford premeditating a long con. He pointed out how much entrepreneurs have to believe in their product, even if no one else does, especially to recruit investors. Why does a startup founder need that much security? In response to the Wharton podcast, Robert Talbot-Stern said in a comment: As for Theranos, There was a toxic mix of an unseasoned, untethered or ethically loose (take your pick) founder in control and a board woefully short of corporate governance skills (whether or not purposely hand-picked by Holmes because of that skill shortage and regardless of their impressive but meaningless credentials for their board role). I am an optimist and I would like to think that this is a healthy watershed moment for startups that have unicorn status, that get all this money, and that boards will be more careful and that CEO's frankly will be more open to being questioned.